TL;DR
Get kitchen staples and gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Good Housekeeping’s Beauty Lab report highlights six mascaras that performed well in testing for people with sensitive eyes, including options for length, volume and contact lens wearers. The selections draw on consumer feedback, laboratory performance assessments and SkinSAFE allergen screening; results do not guarantee that an individual will avoid irritation.
Good Housekeeping’s Beauty Lab has named six mascaras it recommends for sensitive eyes, drawing on product testing, consumer evaluations and allergen screening. The list includes options from CoverGirl, Essence, Almay, e.l.f. and Lancôme, with different strengths such as lengthening, volumizing and suitability for contact lens wearers.
The report’s six picks include CoverGirl Lash Blast (the report does not specify the exact version in its first product entry), Essence’s mascara, Almay’s hypoallergenic formula, e.l.f.’s mascara, a Lancôme formula and a second CoverGirl mascara described as appropriate for contact lens wearers. Good Housekeeping says the first CoverGirl pick performed well for length, volume and definition, and resisted smearing in a water test. Some reviewers, however, reported clumping.
Almay and e.l.f. received particular attention for sensitivity-related screening. Good Housekeeping says Almay’s fragrance-free, hypoallergenic mascara earned a SkinSAFE score of 100% and rated well for avoiding redness or irritation during testing. The e.l.f. pick also received a 100% SkinSAFE score and ranked highly for smooth application, separation and lengthening. Some reviewers found it difficult to remove.
The remaining picks offer different trade-offs. Essence’s mascara scored well for length, volume and curl, though some reviewers noticed flaking. Lancôme’s formula performed strongly for thickening and curling and tied for the top rating on avoiding flakes, but some testers experienced clumping. The second CoverGirl product is described as ophthalmologist-tested and suitable for contact lens wearers; it lengthened lashes but was not a strong choice for volume or curl.
Good Housekeeping reports that its Beauty Lab assesses application, lash effects, wear and irritation through consumer testing, alongside screening products with the SkinSAFE database. In its most recent traditional and waterproof mascara test, the lab evaluated 21 new formulas with 402 consumer testers and collected 6,432 evaluations, according to the supplied report. Those figures describe that test, not necessarily each product’s individual sample size.
Choosing a Formula Around Sensitivity
The roundup gives shoppers a way to compare mascaras by more than appearance alone. People with sensitive eyes may want to weigh irritation screening, fragrance status and contact-lens suitability alongside performance, since products that lengthen or curl well can differ in removal, flaking and clumping.
Its findings also show why no single pick is best for everyone: a formula praised for volume may be less easy to remove, while a milder option may offer less curl. The lab results and tester feedback can inform a purchase, but they are not a medical guarantee or a substitute for a person’s own response to a cosmetic product.
hypoallergenic mascara for sensitive eyes
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Beauty Lab Evaluates Mascara
Good Housekeeping says consumer testers rate mascaras on ease of application, lengthening, volumizing, curling and lash definition, as well as wear issues such as smudging and flaking. Testers also report whether their eyes or the surrounding skin became irritated.
Scientists consult SkinSAFE, a product database used to identify formulas free of common allergens. The report says waterproof products are additionally assessed through a splash test: testers wait 10 minutes after application, then splash their faces repeatedly with warm water to check for smearing or transfer. A high screening score or a favorable test result addresses the criteria measured; it cannot establish that every user will tolerate a product.
““I have sensitive eyes, and this mascara did not irritate them.””
— A Good Housekeeping consumer tester, quoted in the report on the e.l.f. mascara
Limits of the Reported Results
The supplied report does not give the article’s publication date, the exact product names or full versions for every pick, or product-by-product tester counts. It also does not establish how often irritation occurred across all participants, or whether performance differs among users with particular eye conditions or allergies. Individual sensitivity varies, and a product described as hypoallergenic or ophthalmologist-tested can still cause a reaction in some people.
The report’s findings are based on the Beauty Lab’s stated methods and tester feedback. The provided material does not include independent clinical studies, full ingredient lists for all six products, or a complete explanation of how each SkinSAFE score was calculated.
What Shoppers Can Check Before Buying
Readers can compare the specific product version and shade with the current packaging and ingredient list before purchase, since formulas and availability may change. People with known sensitivities can check for ingredients they avoid and consult an eye-care professional if they have concerns about using mascara, particularly around contact lenses.
Good Housekeeping’s supplied report does not announce a follow-up test or a future update date. The next useful step for shoppers is to match the reported strengths—such as length, volume, removal and contact-lens suitability—to their own needs, while treating tester ratings as guidance rather than a promise of irritation-free wear.
Key Questions
Which mascara in the report received a 100% SkinSAFE score?
Almay’s mascara and the e.l.f. pick are each described in the supplied report as having a 100% SkinSAFE score. The score reflects screening against common allergens and irritants; it does not guarantee that no user will react.
Which pick is described as suitable for contact lens wearers?
The report describes a CoverGirl mascara as ophthalmologist-tested and suitable for sensitive eyes and contact lens wearers. It performed well for lengthening, but testers did not rate it as a leading choice for volume or curl.
Did the testing show that these mascaras cannot irritate eyes?
No. Some products scored well on irritation-related testing, but individual reactions can differ. The report does not claim that any mascara is guaranteed to be irritation-free for every person.
How did Good Housekeeping test mascara performance?
The Beauty Lab used consumer ratings for application, lash effects, wear and irritation, and consulted SkinSAFE for allergen screening. For waterproof formulas, testers applied mascara, waited 10 minutes and repeatedly splashed warm water on their faces to assess transfer.
Source: rss
NFL season / tailgating Picks
team gear
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
