Choosing a Vitamix comes down less to whether it can blend a smoothie and more to how much you make, how much control you want, and how much counter space you can spare. In this lineup, I’d start with the Propel Series 750 for its preset programs and cabinet-friendly 64-ounce container, the 5200 for hands-on speed control and broad recipe flexibility, or the E310 if a 48-ounce container better suits smaller batches. Those strengths come with tradeoffs: the larger machines take up more room, while the smaller options limit batch size or recipe range.
Get kitchen staples and gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
I’ve ranked these five around practical differences, not a claim that every buyer needs the most powerful or feature-rich model. The Nano Personal Blender is the clear pick for portable single servings, while the newer VX1 offers a straightforward full-size setup with a tamper and variable-speed controls. Read on to see which features change daily use—and which limitations might make another Vitamix a better match.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- The Propel Series 750 is my leading choice for buyers who want a 64-ounce container, four automatic programs, variable speeds, and a low-profile design.
- The 5200 suits cooks who prefer manual control and a broad range of uses, including smoothies, soups, and sauces, but its full-size container and base need room.
- The E310’s 48-ounce container is better matched to smaller households and modest batches than the 64-ounce 5200 or Propel 750.
- The Nano is the only personal-size option here, with two 20-ounce cups and SmoothiePilot automation; it is not a substitute for a full-size recipe blender.
- The VX1 keeps full-size capacity and variable-speed control in a simpler package, though the supplied details list fewer program and warranty specifics than the Propel 750.
| Vitamix Propel Series 750 Professional-Grade Blender, Black |  | Best Overall | Motor power: 2.2 HP | Container capacity: 64 ounces | Container type: Low-profile, BPA-free, dishwasher-safe | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black |  | Best for Hands-On Versatility | Motor power: 2 HP | Container capacity: 64 ounces | Blade material: Stainless steel | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Vitamix E310 Explorian Blender, Professional-Grade, Self-Cleaning 48 oz. Container, Black |  | Best for Smaller Household Batches | Container capacity: 48 ounces | Blade material: Stainless steel | Controls: 10 variable speeds and pulse | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Vitamix VX1 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black |  | Best for a Straightforward Full-Size Setup | Container capacity: 64 ounces | Color: Black | Warranty: 5 years | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Vitamix Nano Personal Blender with SmoothiePilot Technology |  | Best Compact Personal Blender | Blending cups: Two 20-ounce portable cups | Lids: Two to-go lids | Blending program: SmoothiePilot adaptive blending | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Vitamix | Controls | Container capacity | Self-cleaning | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamix Propel Series 750 Prof | 10 variable speeds plus pulse | 64 ounces | Yes; listed cycle completes in under 60 seconds | 7-year limited |
| Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grad | Variable speed | 64 ounces | Yes | 7 years |
| Vitamix E310 Explorian Blender | 10 variable speeds and pulse | 48 ounces | Yes | — |
| Vitamix VX1 Professional-Grade | Variable speed and pulse | 64 ounces | Yes | 5 years |
| Vitamix Nano Personal Blender | Automatic and variable operation | — | — | 3-year limited |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Vitamix Propel Series 750 Professional-Grade Blender, Black
The Propel Series 750 is my best overall pick because it combines a full 64-ounce capacity with more guidance than the manually controlled 5200 or VX1. Its four programs cover smoothies, hot soup, frozen dessert, and dips or spreads, giving a less experienced blender owner a starting point for common jobs. The ten variable speeds and pulse function keep manual control available when a recipe needs a more gradual texture or a quick coarse chop.
The shape of its container is a practical distinction, not a cosmetic one. The low-profile 64-ounce container is designed to fit beneath standard kitchen cabinets, which may make countertop storage easier than with a taller full-size setup. Its 2.2 HP motor and laser-cut stainless-steel blades are specified for tough ingredients such as ice and fibrous produce, while the self-cleaning cycle is listed as taking under a minute. For a household that makes more than drinks, those details make the Propel more adaptable than the Nano and more guided than the 5200.
There are tradeoffs. It remains a full-size machine, so the 64-ounce container and motor base still take up meaningful counter or cupboard space. Presets can simplify repeat tasks, but they do not replace choosing the right speed for every texture; buyers who want a purely manual routine may prefer the 5200’s straightforward variable-speed approach. The supplied listing also gives no specific drawbacks, so I would not mistake that absence for a guarantee that its size, noise, or handling will suit every kitchen. The Propel wins here for its balance of capacity, preset convenience, and storage-aware container design.
Pros:- Four programs cover smoothies, hot soup, frozen dessert, and dips or spreads.
- Low-profile 64-ounce container is designed to fit under standard kitchen cabinets.
- Ten variable speeds and pulse add manual control beyond the presets.
- Self-cleaning cycle is listed as completing in under 60 seconds.
Cons:- Full-size capacity still requires more storage space than the Nano or E310 setup.
- Preset programs may be unnecessary for buyers who prefer the 5200’s direct manual controls.
- The provided description does not list specific drawbacks or clarify every ownership detail.
Best for: Households that want a versatile full-size Vitamix for smoothies, soups, frozen desserts, and spreads, with preset programs and a container designed to fit under standard cabinets.
Not ideal for: Buyers with very limited storage, people who only need one portable drink at a time, or cooks who would rather have a smaller container and a simpler manual setup.
- Motor power:2.2 HP
- Container capacity:64 ounces
- Container type:Low-profile, BPA-free, dishwasher-safe
- Blades:Laser-cut stainless steel
- Programs:Smoothie, Hot Soup, Frozen Dessert, Dip & Spread
- Controls:10 variable speeds plus pulse
- Self-cleaning:Yes; listed cycle completes in under 60 seconds
- Warranty:7-year limited
Our verdict“I’d choose the Propel 750 for the broadest mix of guided programs, full-size capacity, and cabinet-friendly container design.”
Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black
The Vitamix 5200 is the best fit for buyers who want direct control over a full-size blender. Its variable-speed dial lets the cook adjust texture throughout a recipe instead of relying on a preset, and the supplied description names smoothies, hot soups, and sauces among its uses. The 64-ounce container makes it a more natural option for family portions or batch preparation than the 48-ounce E310, while its stated 2 HP motor and stainless-steel blades provide the core full-size blending setup.
Compared with the Propel 750, the 5200 trades automatic programs and a low-profile container for a simpler control scheme. That can appeal to a cook who likes to manage each stage of a blend and does not need dedicated smoothie or soup buttons. Self-cleaning is included, which helps keep cleanup from becoming a drawback after soups or sauces. Its seven-year warranty is also longer than the five-year warranty listed for the VX1.
The main cost of choosing this model is physical rather than functional: the 5200 is described as heavy and bulky, and a 64-ounce container can be more than a single-person kitchen needs. It also does not list the four automatic programs found on the Propel. Buyers who want guided settings or a container designed to fit below standard cabinets should compare those details before choosing. I rank the 5200 just below the Propel because it is highly versatile but less tailored to convenience and storage; for manual-control cooks, that order may not reflect their personal preference.
Pros:- Variable speed control supports hands-on adjustments to texture.
- 64-ounce container suits larger blends and batch preparation.
- Supplied use cases include smoothies, hot soups, and sauces.
- Self-cleaning function and a listed seven-year warranty add practical ownership support.
Cons:- Heavy, bulky design can be harder to store or move than the E310 or Nano.
- No preset blending programs are listed, unlike the Propel 750.
- The 64-ounce container may be larger than needed for one or two servings.
Best for: Cooks who want a full-size, variable-speed blender for drinks and broader kitchen tasks such as soups and sauces, and who are comfortable managing blending manually.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a compact machine, prefer automatic programs, or usually make personal-size portions rather than larger batches.
- Motor power:2 HP
- Container capacity:64 ounces
- Blade material:Stainless steel
- Controls:Variable speed
- Self-cleaning:Yes
- Warranty:7 years
- Color:Black
- Container material:BPA-free
Our verdict“I recommend the 5200 to cooks who value manual speed control and broad recipe use more than presets or a compact footprint.”
Vitamix E310 Explorian Blender, Professional-Grade, Self-Cleaning 48 oz. Container, Black
The E310 is my pick for smaller household batches, where a 64-ounce container can feel like more machine than the job requires. Its 48-ounce capacity is smaller than the 5200 and Propel 750, yet it retains ten variable speeds and pulse. That gives the cook a useful range of control for moving between smooth purées and chunkier salsa, rather than narrowing the machine to a single drink-focused task like the Nano.
This is the more sensible full-size-style choice for buyers who make a few servings at a time and still want to blend beyond smoothies. The hardened stainless-steel blades and self-cleaning function match practical features found on the larger models, while the smaller stated capacity can better suit routine meal prep in a compact household. Compared with the VX1, the E310 has a clearly specified 48-ounce container and ten speeds; compared with the 5200, it gives up container volume in exchange for a batch size that may be easier to match to everyday needs.
The limit is straightforward: 48 ounces is not the best fit for repeated large batches. A family making several servings at once may find the 5200 or Propel’s 64-ounce capacity more useful. The supplied information also notes that it may feel expensive beside basic blenders, so its more capable controls and construction only make sense if those are features the buyer will use. I place it below the larger general-purpose picks because of that capacity ceiling, not because smaller batches are inherently a compromise.
Pros:- 48-ounce container can suit smaller batches better than the 64-ounce models.
- Ten variable speeds and pulse provide control over different textures.
- Stainless-steel blades support varied blending tasks.
- Self-cleaning function simplifies cleanup.
Cons:- Smaller capacity is less convenient for large family batches.
- The supplied description notes that it may be expensive compared with basic blenders.
- No automatic programs are listed, unlike the Propel 750.
Best for: Individuals, couples, and smaller households that want variable speed and pulse controls for drinks, purées, and chunky preparations without defaulting to a 64-ounce container.
Not ideal for: Families or meal-prep cooks who routinely blend large quantities, or buyers who need portable cups and a personal-blender format.
- Container capacity:48 ounces
- Blade material:Stainless steel
- Controls:10 variable speeds and pulse
- Self-cleaning:Yes
- Color:Black
- Container style:Full-size blender container
Our verdict“I’d choose the E310 when 48 ounces matches the household’s usual batch size and manual control matters more than preset programs.”
Vitamix VX1 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black
The VX1 is a straightforward full-size option for buyers who want a 64-ounce container, variable speed, pulse, and a tamper without a listed suite of automatic programs. Its stated setup covers core blending needs, and self-cleaning is included. The tamper is a useful distinction when a recipe needs ingredients nudged toward the blades; the supplied details do not list a tamper for the 5200, E310, or Nano, so this may matter to cooks who make thicker blends.
Against the Propel 750, the VX1 has fewer specified convenience features: the Propel lists four programs, ten variable speeds, and a low-profile container, while the VX1’s information names variable speed and pulse but does not state the number of speed settings or a preset menu. The VX1 does share the 64-ounce capacity of the 5200, but its listed five-year warranty is shorter than the seven years specified for both the 5200 and Propel. For shoppers who want clearly stated long-term coverage or program guidance, those differences favor the other full-size picks.
Its strengths are a familiar full-size capacity, stainless-steel blades, a tamper, and a cleaning function. Its drawback is uncertainty in the supplied specifications: motor power and speed count are not given, making a direct performance comparison difficult. The listing also notes that the blender may be heavy, and it comes in a limited color selection. I place it below the E310 for most smaller households and below the more fully specified full-size models for broad recommendation, while keeping it as a reasonable option for someone drawn to its basic control layout and included tamper.
Pros:- 64-ounce container suits larger batches.
- Variable speed and pulse provide manual control.
- A tamper is included for helping manage thicker blends.
- Self-cleaning function is listed.
Cons:- Motor power and the number of variable speeds are not specified in the supplied details.
- Five-year warranty is shorter than the seven-year terms listed for the 5200 and Propel 750.
- Full-size design may be heavy, and color options are limited.
Best for: Buyers seeking a full-size 64-ounce Vitamix with variable speed, pulse, a tamper, and self-cleaning, without needing specified automatic programs.
Not ideal for: Shoppers who want confirmed motor-power details, a listed count of speed settings, a longer specified warranty, or the Propel 750’s automatic programs and low-profile container.
- Container capacity:64 ounces
- Color:Black
- Warranty:5 years
- Blade material:Stainless steel
- Controls:Variable speed and pulse
- Tamper:Included
- Self-cleaning:Yes
Our verdict“I’d shortlist the VX1 for its tamper-equipped full-size setup, but I’d compare its unspecified motor and speed details against the better-documented 5200 and Propel 750.”
Vitamix Nano Personal Blender with SmoothiePilot Technology
The Nano is the clear choice for portable single servings, not a shrunken replacement for a 64-ounce kitchen blender. It includes two 20-ounce portable cups and two to-go lids, so its format is built around making a drink that can travel with the user. Its SmoothiePilot adaptive blending program is intended to adjust blending for consistent smoothie results, which lowers the amount of manual speed selection compared with the 5200, E310, and VX1.
That simplicity is the Nano’s main appeal and its defining limit. It takes up less space than the full-size machines and is described as easy to assemble and clean, making it a better fit for a small kitchen or a quick morning routine. But the supplied details specifically frame it around smoothies and frozen drinks; they do not position it for hot soup, sauces, dips, or larger family recipes. The Propel 750 is far more versatile for those jobs, while the E310 offers a smaller full-size container for cooks who still want variable speed and pulse for different foods.
Buyers should also be comfortable with a more guided control experience. The Nano has automatic and variable operation, but detailed speed settings are not provided, so a cook who wants fine manual adjustment should look to the ten-speed E310 or Propel 750. Its two 20-ounce cups help with back-to-back personal drinks, but they cannot match the output of a 48- or 64-ounce container. I rank it last for general-purpose Vitamix use, while making it the strongest match for someone whose actual need is portable smoothies in a compact package.
Pros:- Compact format suits smaller kitchens and personal blending.
- Two 20-ounce portable cups and two to-go lids support drinks on the move.
- SmoothiePilot adaptive program is designed for consistent smoothie results.
- Easy-to-clean design and a three-year limited warranty are specified.
Cons:- The supplied description limits its intended use to smoothies and frozen drinks.
- Small cup capacity is not suited to large households or batch preparation.
- Detailed speed settings are not listed beyond automatic and variable operation.
Best for: People who mainly blend individual smoothies or frozen drinks and value compact storage, portable cups, and adaptive program operation.
Not ideal for: Cooks who need soups, sauces, dips, large batches, or detailed manual speed adjustment.
- Blending cups:Two 20-ounce portable cups
- Lids:Two to-go lids
- Blending program:SmoothiePilot adaptive blending
- Controls:Automatic and variable operation
- Motor base:Included
- Blade base:Included
- Warranty:3-year limited
- Design:Compact personal blender
Our verdict“I recommend the Nano only when portable personal drinks are the priority; for broader kitchen use, I’d move up to the E310 or a 64-ounce model.”
How We Picked
I compared these models by the choices that most affect ownership: container capacity, control style, cooking versatility, footprint, cleanup, and the amount of product detail supplied. That makes the ranking useful for real buying decisions. A personal blender can be the best fit for one person who wants a portable breakfast, but it is a poor match for someone making soup or blending for a family. Likewise, a large container offers room for bigger batches, yet it asks for more storage and can be excessive for a couple making one drink at a time.
I gave the highest placement to a model with a strong balance of capacity, usable controls, and features that address everyday kitchen constraints. That is why the Propel 750 ranks first: its 64-ounce low-profile container is designed to fit beneath standard cabinets, and its programs give buyers a shortcut for common blends without removing variable speed and pulse control. The 5200 ranks closely behind for its manual flexibility and stated ability to handle hot soups, smoothies, and sauces, but it lacks the Propel’s listed preset programs and low-profile-container advantage.
I also separated products by role instead of treating every machine as a rival for the same buyer. The E310’s smaller 48-ounce capacity is a meaningful benefit for smaller batches, not simply a lesser version of a 64-ounce blender. The VX1 is a full-size alternative with variable speed, pulse, a tamper, and self-cleaning, but its supplied information does not specify motor power or a full set of preset programs. The Nano sits in a different category altogether: its cups and adaptive smoothie program prioritize portable drinks, not general-purpose food preparation.
Product details here are based on the specifications and claims supplied for each listing. I do not treat missing information as proof that a feature is absent; I do treat it as a reason buyers may want to verify that detail before choosing. I also weighed drawbacks alongside strengths, including storage demands, batch-size limits, control simplicity, and the distinction between personal blending and full-size kitchen use. The ranking reflects fit and versatility, not a promise that one blender is right for every kitchen.
| Vitamix | Self-cleaning |
|---|---|
| Vitamix Propel Series 750 Prof | Yes; listed cycle completes in under 60 seconds |
| Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grad | Yes |
| Vitamix E310 Explorian Blender | Yes |
| Vitamix VX1 Professional-Grade | Yes |
| Vitamix Nano Personal Blender | — |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Vitamix
I’d choose a Vitamix by matching the machine’s format and controls to the recipes I actually make. Capacity, automation, and storage are more useful dividing lines than a general claim of power.Pick a capacity that matches your usual batch
The biggest split in this group is between the Nano’s two 20-ounce personal cups, the E310’s 48-ounce container, and the 64-ounce containers on the 5200, VX1, and Propel 750. Personal cups make sense when each blend is a drink to take along; they are not built for a family soup or several servings in one go. The E310’s size sits between personal blending and the larger full-size machines, which can be a good match for a couple or smaller household. If batch cooking or serving several people is routine, the 64-ounce models offer more room per blend. I would not choose the largest capacity by default: a container that is too big for the usual job can add storage bulk without making daily drinks more convenient.
Decide whether presets or manual control suit you
The Propel 750 is the only model here with four named automatic programs: smoothie, hot soup, frozen dessert, and dip or spread. That matters if repeatable one-touch routines appeal to you, though it still provides ten variable speeds and pulse for hands-on blending. The 5200 and E310 emphasize manual speed adjustment; the VX1 lists variable speed and pulse but does not specify the number of speed settings. The Nano takes a different path, using SmoothiePilot adaptive blending for smoothies alongside automatic and variable operation. I’d favor presets for ease with familiar jobs, manual controls for adjusting texture as I go, and the Nano’s guided program only when portable drinks are the main task.
Match the blender to the recipes, not just the motor
For general kitchen use, the supplied descriptions identify the 5200 as suitable for smoothies, hot soups, and sauces, and the Propel lists programs for soup, frozen desserts, and dips or spreads. The E310’s variable speeds and pulse support different textures, including smooth purées and chunky salsa. The VX1 includes a tamper, which may help with thicker mixtures, though its supplied details do not spell out a full recipe range. The Nano is specifically framed for smoothies and frozen drinks. If soups, sauces, and spreads are part of the plan, I’d skip the personal blender and compare full-size models; if the task is a single portable smoothie, the extra capacity of those machines may not be useful.
Think about where the blender will live
Full-size Vitamix models ask for more counter or cupboard room. The 5200 and VX1 are described as potentially heavy, and the large containers themselves need a place when not in use. The Propel’s low-profile container is designed to fit under standard kitchen cabinets, a specific advantage for people who prefer leaving a blender on the counter. The E310 offers a smaller stated container than the 64-ounce choices, while the Nano is the most compact format in this group. Before deciding, measure the available shelf or counter space and think about whether the machine will be moved often. A powerful blender that is awkward to reach can be a poor everyday fit.
Compare cleanup and warranty details
Self-cleaning is listed for the 5200, VX1, E310, and Propel 750, and the Propel’s cycle is specified as taking under 60 seconds. The Nano is described as easy to clean and assemble, but its listing presents it as a personal-format machine rather than giving the same self-cleaning detail. Warranty information varies: seven years are listed for the 5200 and Propel 750, five for the VX1, and three years limited for the Nano; the E310’s supplied details do not state a warranty term. I’d verify coverage for the exact listing before buying, especially when comparing the E310 with models whose terms are provided. A cleanup feature helps with routine care, but it does not remove the need to clean the container and components as directed.
Use missing details as a reason to verify
Some listings provide a fuller specification set than others. The 5200 gives a stated 2 HP motor, the Propel gives 2.2 HP, and the VX1 description says it has a powerful motor without naming its horsepower or speed count. The Nano’s supplied controls do not give detailed speed settings, and the E310 listing does not state a warranty term. Those gaps do not prove a feature is absent, but they make a like-for-like comparison harder. Before choosing a less fully specified listing, check the current product information for the exact motor, control, accessory, and warranty details that matter to your use.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Vitamix in this comparison is best for most households?
I’d start with the Propel Series 750 for many households because it pairs a 64-ounce container with four programs, ten variable speeds, pulse, and a low-profile design intended to fit beneath standard cabinets. It is a flexible match for drinks and several food-preparation tasks. The 5200 may suit a cook who prefers direct manual control, while the E310 may make more sense if a 48-ounce batch is closer to the household’s normal routine.
Is the Vitamix Nano a replacement for a full-size blender?
Not for most general kitchen jobs. The Nano is designed around personal smoothies and frozen drinks, with two 20-ounce cups and to-go lids. That makes it useful for portable servings, but its capacity and stated recipe focus differ from the full-size 5200, VX1, E310, and Propel 750. If you want to blend soups, sauces, dips, or larger batches, I’d choose one of the full-size options instead.
Should I choose the 5200 or the Propel 750?
I’d choose the 5200 for a straightforward manual-control approach and the Propel 750 for more guided convenience. Both have 64-ounce containers and a seven-year warranty listed, but the Propel adds four programs, ten variable speeds plus pulse, and a low-profile container. The 5200 lists a 2 HP motor and a broad use range that includes soups and sauces. Your preference for presets, container shape, and manual adjustment should decide between them.
Is the E310’s 48-ounce container too small?
That depends on the amount you usually blend. The 48-ounce E310 container can suit individuals, couples, or smaller household batches, while the 64-ounce models provide more room for family servings or batch preparation. If you regularly need several portions at once, the larger capacity of the 5200, VX1, or Propel 750 is likely the better fit. If your routine is modest, the E310’s capacity may be a more natural match than buying around larger batches you rarely make.
What should I check before choosing the Vitamix VX1?
The VX1 listing specifies a 64-ounce container, variable speed, pulse, a tamper, self-cleaning, stainless-steel blades, and a five-year warranty. It does not state motor power or the number of speed settings in the supplied details. I’d confirm those points if they matter to your comparison, and weigh its five-year listed warranty against the seven-year terms given for the 5200 and Propel 750. The Propel also has four listed automatic programs, while the VX1’s supplied feature list is more basic.
Conclusion
My recommendation depends on the kind of blending you expect to do. For a versatile full-size machine with guided programs and a container designed to fit under standard cabinets, I’d pick the Propel Series 750. For a cook who wants manual control across smoothies, soups, and sauces, the 5200 is a strong alternative, provided its size suits the kitchen. Smaller households can look to the E310 when 48 ounces is enough for routine batches; the VX1 is worth comparing for its tamper-equipped full-size setup, with a check of its unspecified motor and speed details. If the goal is a compact portable smoothie routine rather than broad food prep, choose the Nano. I would decide by matching container size and control style to everyday use, then confirm any specification or warranty detail that matters but is not listed.
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
